Benjamin Blase Caryl – U. S. Steel

Taking a steely resolve in trade action

It’s a high-stakes year for the American steel industry with continued trade relief at risk. So says Benjamin Blase Caryl, as he rolls out a defensive and offensive game plan as lead trade counsel for United States Steel Corporation.

Caryl believes the American steel industry must defend antidumping and countervailing duties—AD/CVD, in international trade parlance—that have helped bolster domestic production and investment. The industry must also defend the Section 232 national security action on steel imports, he says. But Caryl is playing offense too, by petitioning for additional AD/CVD relief and being a thought leader in global steel negotiations.

Benjamin Blase Caryl | Associate General Counsel—International Trade & Public Policy | U. S. Steel

Benjamin Blase Caryl | Associate General Counsel—International Trade & Public Policy | U. S. Steel

He leads the Pittsburgh-headquartered company’s trade action from Washington, D.C., working with the company’s commercial, government affairs and strategy teams, as well as industry allies. He also manages outside counsel and engages the feds to ensure the company’s trade interests are considered by policymakers.

“It’s a fascinating time for the steel industry,” he tells Vanguard in April. “But within the trade law and policy world, it’s a pivotal year for U. S. Steel and me.”

Also, a year to build upon 2021’s momentum.

Demand recovering, competition up

In 2021, as the economy re-opened post-pandemic, the American steel industry saw record revenue and profits poured into mergers, acquisitions and capital investments in newer, cleaner technology. But with foreign companies maintaining and increasing their foothold in the attractive U.S. market, Caryl remains vigilant about protecting U. S. Steel’s turf.

Domestic producers have benefited from AD/CVD, with the U.S. Department of Commerce imposing additional duties on specific steel imports from countries found to be sold at unfairly low or subsidized prices. The laser-like focus of AD/CVD, however, suffers from the “Whac-A-Mole” problem, Caryl says. When the U.S. cracks down on Chinese and South Korean steel, other countries pop up and try to take advantage, such as Canada, Mexico and Vietnam.

Benjamin Blase Caryl | Associate General Counsel—International Trade & Public Policy | U. S. Steel

Caryl at the Edgar Thomson mill in Pittsburgh, where steel has been in production since 1875.

AD/CVD orders imposed in 2016 on flat-rolled steel from 12 countries, including China, are up for review this year by the U.S. International Trade Commission. Caryl wants to see the duties extended.

“Much of the import competition we face is unfairly traded and fueled by massive global steel overcapacity,” he says, noting the OECD estimates global steel overcapacity exceeds 500 million tons per year—more than five times the entire U.S. market and 17 times total U.S. imports.

“China is also investing in and subsidizing steel operations beyond its borders—in Asia, the Middle East, Africa and even Europe.”

Caryl is playing offense, too, by petitioning the federal government for additional AD/CVD relief against steel pipe used in the oil and gas industry from Argentina, Korea, Mexico, and Russia.

In need of teammates, he leans heavily on Cassidy Levy Kent, a Washington law firm specializing in trade law issues and AD/CVD. Another legal heavyweight—Chicago-headquartered Mayer Brown—helps Caryl and U. S. Steel with policy issues including Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 that allows the president to impose tariffs or other remedies if “an article is being imported … in such quantities or under such circumstances as to threaten or impair the national security.”

For a fair trade

Section 232 might be rare common ground between the Biden administration and the preceding one. In 2018, President Trump used it to flex his “America First” muscles, imposing 25 percent tariffs on steel and setting off a trade war with several foreign allies. Caryl credits then-Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and President Trump for understanding that domestic steel capacity is fundamental to national security, which under Section 232 includes not only military needs but critical infrastructure, economic security and the viability of the U.S. manufacturing base.

Caryl also credits the Biden administration for continuing the overall Section 232 steel action. In January, President Biden tweaked it to exempt the first 3.3 million metric tons of European Union steel from tariffs. But Caryl worked with others to ensure that only steel melted and poured in the EU is eligible for the exemption, which means Chinese-produced steel that’s sent to Europe for finishing remains subject to 25 percent tariff. Most importantly, Caryl notes the EU deal is much more restrictive than earlier deals with Canada and Mexico.

Caryl speaking to the Steel Framing Industry Association pre-COVID

The industry’s also changing, with the Biden administration rejoining the Paris Accords and pursuing a progressive climate policy. The U.S. and EU are beginning negotiations on a “global arrangement” on steel overcapacity and decarbonization with a target of the end of 2023 for completion.

“This is a perfect example of where trade and climate policy intersect,” Caryl says. “The global arrangement could create new enforceable rules for steel overcapacity, trade and government support for decarbonization, as well as new standards and rules for low-carbon steel products.”

Strong enough to bend

Born and raised in West Virginia, Caryl saw firsthand how imports can devastate communities. After earning degrees in political economy and law from Tulane University, Caryl moved to Washington, D.C., to begin his career in the Commerce Department’s “non-market economy” (i.e., China) office where he worked on the first CVD investigation on China.

Caryl was then appointed as counsel to ITC Commissioner Charlotte Lane and completed a master of laws in trade at Georgetown at the top of his class. After the ITC, Caryl entered private practice at Kelley Drye & Warren and Crowell & Moring, where he focused on AD/CVD, customs and trade policy from all angles (for U.S. producers, importers, consumers, and foreign producer/exporters) for myriad industries, but especially the steel industry.

In November 2017, Caryl landed his dream job and hit the ground running.

Benjamin Blase Caryl | Associate General Counsel—International Trade & Public Policy | U. S. Steel

“When I arrived at U. S. Steel, we undertook a complete review of our outside trade counsel and internal trade action governance and budgets,” he says. Within a year, he brought in former Commerce Department trade specialist Kaitlin Wojnar to serve as in-housel trade counsel and insource as much of the trade work as possible.

“My prior experience at law firms helped me know what actions and issues to focus on, who should focus on what, and how much it should cost,” he says. “My understanding of U. S. Steel’s strategic priorities and the steel industry helps us focus on what matters the most. By working closely with outside counsel and insourcing, we have been able to both significantly reduce our outside trade spend and increase our trade action effectiveness.”

Caryl serves as a cleared adviser to the Commerce Department, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and Homeland Security. At home, he enjoys telling his wife and two children all about steel and supporting Washington sports teams—and sometimes the Pittsburgh Steelers.

Caryl was not exaggerating when he said 2022 is a pivotal year for U. S. Steel trade action: “Many of these are uphill battles, but we must win another five years of existing AD/CVD relief on flat-rolled steel, win new AD/CVD relief on steel pipe, maintain the Section 232 action, and shape steel trade and climate negotiations—all to support U. S. Steel’s financial, operational, and strategic performance for years to come.”

View this feature in the Vanguard Summer I 2022 Edition here.

Showcase your feature on your website with a custom “As Featured in Vanguard” badge that links directly to your article!

Copy and paste this script into your page coding (ideally right before the closing tag) where you want to display our review banner.


It was a great honor to be featured in Vanguard Law. Working with every member of the team, from the initial interview with Erin Clark, through production with Victor Martins, writing the article with Taryn Plumb and creating the final content with Dave Gushee, was a true pleasure. Everyone was very professional, enthusiastic and supportive, and their creative approach and positive attitude clearly came through in the final product.
– Kevin C. Rakowski, Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel, Compliance with Radian Group Inc.
I was honored to be the subject of an article. I enjoy reading Vanguard articles and seeing how other attorneys got to their positions and see their jobs. It's also interesting to see how different law firms partner with the subjects of the articles.
– Henry Marquard, in-house counsel, Stanley Consultants Inc.
The piece highlighting my company, Bob Baker Enterprises, Inc., came out fabulous. Our company is in the new and used car sales and service industry. Everyone was great to work with and extremely professional. They produced a high-quality product and have provided expert assistance and guidance post-production of the article.
– Wade Poulson, General Counsel, Bob Baker Enterprises Inc.
As promised in advance, my feature in Vanguard has increased my visibility within the profession and prompted more than a few people I have not communicated with recently to reconnect. One of the Italian law firms I have used in the past is now in the process of interviewing me for an article on their website and tweeting out the feature story. Activity and the number of people connecting with me on LinkedIn has soared, which is great. The Vanguard writers and editorial staff were great to work with—highly professional and made the effort to make the experience both fun and rewarding (they were also respectful of the time pressures and demands all lawyers face). I was very pleased with the experience and the final outcome. Needless to say, I have been very pleased. All in all working with Vanguard has been a very positive experience which generated good publicity for both Shawcor and myself. My sincere thanks.
– Tim Hutzul, General Counsel, ShawCor Ltd.


Spring III 2024



  • * We’ll never share your email or info with anyone.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.