Features

Leisa Talbert Peschel – Jackson Walker

Houston, we have a quarter billion-dollar verdict

For Leisa Talbert Peschel and Wasif Qureshi, partners at the Texas-based law firm Jackson Walker, no two cases are ever the same. Then again, there aren’t many massive lawsuits between two, multibillion-dollar companies.

In February of 2019, ESW Holdings, a private equity company, filed a lawsuit against digital streaming giant Roku for allegedly infringing on five patents—all of them relating to how television creates content and how consumers interact with it.

Roku Developer Environment provides channel developers and other content providers a platform on which to share content. ESW claimed, among other things, that Roku was allowing users to create content, not just watch it, which boosted Roku’s revenue from increased advertising and channel subscription fees.

Leisa Talbert Peschel | Partner | Jackson Walker

Leisa Talbert Peschel | Partner | Jackson Walker

Initially, ESW wanted the jury to award infringement damages of $10 million. Then the amount jumped at trial to $62 million—and, finally, a mind-boggling $228 million.

“We’d just entered very dangerous waters,” recalls Peschel, who was representing Roku. “COVID-19 had shut down the courts and, in that time, seven Texas trials concluded with $3.7 billion awards to patent holders. The jury on a Waco patent trial a few weeks before ours awarded the plaintiff over $2.18 billion. Our legal team worked hard to present the jury with Roku’s clear, credible and irrefutable evidence.”

Writing on the court wall

Before the case went to trial, Jackson Walker was successful in eradicating three out of the five patents concerns under the one umbrella suit: two from the court granting a summary judgment of no infringement and one from a pre-trial dismissal.

On April 5, 2021, the grueling four-day trial on the two remaining patents began, with Peschel making the opening statement. It was one of Texas’s first in-person sessions since the pandemic began.

In some cases involving technology, she says the jury may not understand the minutiae. With Roku, the jury’s familiarity with streaming TV services allowed her and the other attorneys to lay out far more technical arguments than they normally would, Peschel says.

Leisa Talbert Peschel | Partner | Jackson Walker

Karina Tiwana (ALE GC) and Chris Cravey, Partner

“Right from the start, I needed to draw a distinct, hard line between the patented interactive TV technologies—ESW’s arena—and streaming TV services—Roku’s arena,” Peschel recalls. “My goal was clearly illustrating to the jury that the intellectual property infringement claims were baseless as the two markets were entirely different. That, I think, was essential to setting up our defense.”

A week later, the jury of six reached its verdict: There had been no infringement on the part of Roku and—as such—no damages would be awarded. The Jackson Walker team had led Roku to success against the two remaining ESW patents.

A new digital chapter

While the Roku case loomed large in Peschel’s mind—and desk—it certainly wasn’t the only one she was tackling. She works on a variety of patent litigation, including an upcoming case involving dental imaging and several involving computer networking.

In some respects, COVID-19 ended up making things easier for Peschel and her colleagues.

Not surprisingly, remote video depositions became a timesaver—and more cost-effective for both the lawyers and their clients. Instead of taking depositions in person, Peschel and others at JW could carry them out via Zoom and other similar platforms. This also saved clients time and money as they didn’t need to fly out or fly the lawyers out to them for a couple hours deposition.

Leisa Talbert Peschel | Partner | Jackson Walker

It also helped in the court room. According to Peschel, she and other JW lawyers had used recorded video witness testimony well before the pandemic had everyone turning to computer screens. She says that the jury, however, tended to place more weight on live, in-person testimony.

“With the reliance on video and other forms of virtual communication during the pandemic, the jury bias against recorded videos versus live in-person witness testimony seems to have lessened significantly,” Peschel says. “That opens the door for more widespread use of remote video depositions, even as we enter a post-pandemic situation.”

When facts are better than fiction

Leisa Talbert Peschel hadn’t always planned to stand in front of juries. In fact, her original goal was to stand at the head of a classroom. But her life took an unexpected twist when she decided to attend the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center to pursue her doctorate in biomedical sciences, studying environmental and molecular cancer formation.

“After graduating with my bachelor’s degrees in biochemistry and chemistry at U.T., I was going to become a high school science teacher, but I realized I was too close in age to my students,” Peschel says with a laugh.

In fact, she was only two years older than them. High school advanced placement credits helped her graduate from university in only three years. She would have graduated in two and a half but decided to take an extra semester to receive her student teaching certificate.

So, she decided to go back to school to become a cancer researcher. That remained her plan until an intellectual property attorney spoke to her graduate association, for which Peschel had been serving as president. The same year she graduated with her Ph.D., she once again returned to University of Texas, this time for her law degree.

Leisa Talbert Peschel | Partner | Jackson Walker

For Peschel, the fourth degree was the charm. Most IP lawyers tend to stay in one area, Peschel says. Given her background though, she unsurprisingly veered into diverse categories: biotech, oil and gas, chemical and many others. Most her litigation has focused on computer networking and electrical engineering.

Her interests outside of work range widely as well. She enjoys watching her daughters play basketball and dance competitively.

Family is a big reason why Peschel remained in Texas and why she’s maybe five to 10 years behind where she could be, but she doesn’t mind. She says she took a steady approach to her career, which allowed her to retain control of how much and where she works, so she can spend more time with her family.

“I also enjoy my career immensely, so much so, that when I write fiction, my characters often too closely resemble reality, which is why I’m not publishing anything any time soon,” she adds.

View this feature in the Vanguard Fall I 2021 Edition here.

Published on: August 24, 2021

regions:

categories: ,

Showcase your feature on your website with a custom “As Featured in Vanguard” badge that links directly to your article!

Copy and paste this script into your page coding (ideally right before the closing tag) where you want to display our review banner.

Testimonials

I was honored to be the subject of an article. I enjoy reading Vanguard articles and seeing how other attorneys got to their positions and see their jobs. It's also interesting to see how different law firms partner with the subjects of the articles.
– Henry Marquard, in-house counsel, Stanley Consultants Inc.
It was a great honor to be featured in Vanguard Law. Working with every member of the team, from the initial interview with Erin Clark, through production with Victor Martins, writing the article with Taryn Plumb and creating the final content with Dave Gushee, was a true pleasure. Everyone was very professional, enthusiastic and supportive, and their creative approach and positive attitude clearly came through in the final product.
– Kevin C. Rakowski, Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel, Compliance with Radian Group Inc.
As promised in advance, my feature in Vanguard has increased my visibility within the profession and prompted more than a few people I have not communicated with recently to reconnect. One of the Italian law firms I have used in the past is now in the process of interviewing me for an article on their website and tweeting out the feature story. Activity and the number of people connecting with me on LinkedIn has soared, which is great. The Vanguard writers and editorial staff were great to work with—highly professional and made the effort to make the experience both fun and rewarding (they were also respectful of the time pressures and demands all lawyers face). I was very pleased with the experience and the final outcome. Needless to say, I have been very pleased. All in all working with Vanguard has been a very positive experience which generated good publicity for both Shawcor and myself. My sincere thanks.
– Tim Hutzul, General Counsel, ShawCor Ltd.
The piece highlighting my company, Bob Baker Enterprises, Inc., came out fabulous. Our company is in the new and used car sales and service industry. Everyone was great to work with and extremely professional. They produced a high-quality product and have provided expert assistance and guidance post-production of the article.
– Wade Poulson, General Counsel, Bob Baker Enterprises Inc.

LATEST EDITION

Fall II 2021

READ NOW

GET VANGUARD IN YOUR INBOX.

  • * We’ll never share your email or info with anyone.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.